Will a Criminal Conviction Result in a Problem with My Professional License?

I have represented doctors, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and other individuals with professional licenses in Bucks County.  It is always challenging to advise an individual about what their particular licensing body finds acceptable in a criminal conviction.  Frequently, it depends on the license and the crime.  

The Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs provides the umbrella for 29 professional and occupational licensing boards.  These licensing boards have the power to take disciplinary action against a license for "statutorily enumerated reasons" which are contained in their particular statute and other laws.  

It is critical for an individual to explore these issues with a Bucks County criminal attorney and determine the appropriate path in their defense.  

Padilla v. Kentucky & Deportation Issues

Deportation from Bucks County Crimes

When you hear a guilty plea colloquy in Bucks County, you will hear the judge ask the individual or individuals a variation of the following:

If you are not a citizen of the United States, have you had time to consult with an immigration lawyer regarding your legal status?  If so, would you like time to consult with an attorney?  

This is now a standard question.  It started because of Padilla v. Kentucky, a Supreme Court case.  The background is that Padilla pled guilty to drug related charges, but his attorney did not advise him that his plea could lead to his deportation.  The Court held that failing to warn Padilla of the immigration consequences of his plea was ineffective counsel.  

Bucks County Criminal Lawyers Should Know

Most Bucks County criminal defense lawyers will advise their clients to seek immigration assistance if they are charged with a deportable crime.  Most of the time, these crimes are considered "crimes of moral turpitude".  There are a few attorneys I will provide to my clients for consultation.  

So, if you are facing criminal charges in Bucks County and you are not a citizen of the U.S., you must get advisement on your residency and the related criminal charges immediately.  

Trial of William Penn

"My prison shall be my grave before I will budge a jot: for I owe my conscience to no mortal man." - William Penn

Did you know (or remember) that William Penn was put on trial?  Most recall that he was a Quaker, but many may not recall that he was put on trial in England.  Here's what Wikipedia says about the 1670 trial:

Among the most famous of these was the trial following his 1670 arrest with William Meade. Penn was accused of preaching before a gathering in the street, which Penn had deliberately provoked in order to test the validity of the new law against assembly. Penn pleaded for his right to see a copy of the charges laid against him and the laws he had supposedly broken, but the judge (the Lord Mayor of London) refused – even though this right was guaranteed by the law. Furthermore, the judge directed the jury to come to a verdict without hearing the defence.[51]

Despite heavy pressure from the Lord Mayor to convict Penn, the jury returned a verdict of "not guilty". When invited by the judge to reconsider their verdict and to select a new foreman, they refused and were sent to a cell over several nights to mull over their decision. The Lord Mayor then told the jury, "You shall go together and bring in another verdict, or you shall starve", and not only had Penn sent to jail in loathsome Newgate Prison (on a charge of contempt of court), but the full jury followed him, and they were additionally fined the equivalent of a year’s wages each.[52][53] The members of the jury, fighting their case from prison in what became known as Bushel's Case, managed to win the right for all English juries to be free from the control of judges.[54] This case was one of the more important trials that shaped the future concept of American freedom (see jury nullification)[55] and was a victory for the use of the writ of habeas corpusas a means of freeing those unlawfully detained.

Why was this trial so important?  It gave the absolute right of juries to give their verdict based upon their own convictions.  As you can see from the brief play by play, the judge (and a ton of court staff looking for promotions) tried every angle to get a conviction.  The bailiff would not let the jury go home and refused them any food or drink in the hopes of coercing a guilty verdict.  Penn was all of 25 years old when this occurred.  The Quakers, at the time, were frowned upon as the established religion in England was the Church of England.  The trial has all sorts of great quotes and juicy arguments (i.e. Penn said at one moment, "If the common law is so hard to understand, than it was far from being common.").  

In any event, this is a great read for any history fan who would like to see civil disobedience in action.  

What is the Attorney General in Pennsylvania?

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement official of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  The current Attorney General is Kathleen Kane.   The Attorney General prosecutes criminal offenses in multi-jurisdictions and enforces regulations relating to consumer protection issues (via the Bureau of Consumer Protection).  The Attorney General also represents the Commonwealth against all law suits.  

The Attorney General also has numerous safety programs, including online/internet protection for children.  They also administer the registration of the contractors who do home improvement.  They will also pursue people who, for example, lie to their Montgomery County Worker's Compensation Lawyer and fraudulently pursue a worker's comp claim.  

I have had cases in Bucks County involving the Attorney General's office and crimes that either occurred in Bucks County or were consolidated in Bucks County.  Some insurance fraud cases and a drug case that involved multi-jurisdictions and an alleged conspiracy of a drug operation.  Typically, these cases involved investigations by State Troopers and can be lengthy.  The cases can also be older as the Attorney General's office can normally be investigated over a period of years.   

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court

There is the U.S. Supreme Court, but what is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?  

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is the highest court in Pennsylvania.  It hears criminal and civil cases only.  It started in 1864.  There are 7 Supreme Court Justices.  On average, the court gets 3,000 requests a year to hear cases.  Generally, the Supreme Court reviews, 

  • Requests for discretionary appeals from the Commonwealth Court and Superior Court
  • Direct Appeals from a lower court’s decision, including when a sentence of death is issued
  • Requests to intervene in a lower court’s proceedings
  • Requests to deliver a body from illegal detention
  • The Appellate Procedures to reach the Supreme Court are complicated.  If you are looking for a particular case, you should look at their published opinions section or if you statistics about the court you should look at their research area.  

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court - Getting Cases There

    To get a criminal case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is tough.  You may recall my general overview of the PA Supreme Court in a prior blog.  I am facing some potential cases that may eventually get there.  It all depends on the intermediate level courts.  As an aside, did you know that the PA Supreme Court is the nation's oldest appellate court?  

    In speaking with criminal lawyers in Bucks County, it appears that there are a few general reasons why cases get to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.  Here they are:  

    The Supreme Court is selective and the odds of getting a case up for their review as a Petitioner are tough.  First, there is just significant volume to choose from.  Second, the petition may generally be seeking a chance to "correct" a decision below, but the Supreme Court is generally looking for issues to speak about.  The reasons for seeking Supreme Court review must be special and important.  Is this about picayune details of your case or is there generally a potentially new area of the law that needs to be settled?  

    The Supreme Court is not looking to review credibility or upset long settle principles (unless those principles may be antiquated or now unjust).  The Court is not looking towards mere error or fact intensive exceptions?  Instead, they want to settle bigger disputes that have been percolating up through the lower courts for a long time.    


    Can you believe there is a Code of Civility for lawyers?

    There is and it is important.  As summarized by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

    “The conduct of lawyers and judges should be characterized at all times by professional integrity and 

    personal courtesy in the fullest sense of those terms,” the code says in its preamble. “Integrity and 

    courtesy are indispensable to the practice of law and the orderly administration of justice by our courts. 

    Uncivil or obstructive conduct impedes the fundamental goal of resolving disputes in a rational, peaceful 

    and efficient manner.”

    What the Code of Civility states is somewhat obvious, but sometimes missed in the heated sessions in criminal court.  There is also a section on Judicial conduct, but I will focus on lawyers.  

    Essentially, lawyers have to be respectful to other lawyers and to the judge.  They must also be respectful of the court's time (i.e. be prompt) and be formal in addressing individuals (no first names).  Also of major importance is that a lawyer should be respectful of the court staff (who are so very vital, under-appreciated, and helpful).  Also, a lawyer should avoid discussing a case with a judge or the staff outside (ex-parte) the courtroom.  

    The Code is a fascinating read for someone in the legal field as it reminds you how to behave and it also reminds you of stories about how lawyers have not behaved.  

    Procedure for Expungement in Summary Cases

    We have previously discussed eligibility for an expungement in summary cases, the guilty plea procedure for a summary trial in Bucks County, a person's appeal rights after a summary trial in Pennsylvania, and when a person should get a juvenile crimes lawyer if there is a summary offense for a juvenile.  

    But, if you have a summary conviction on your record, how do you go about getting it expunged?  Well, your friendly Bucks County Criminal Defense Lawyers are here to help.  The procedure is encompassed in Rule 490 of the Pennsylvania code.  Your petition for expungement must include a host of items, which is included in Rule 490:

     (A)  Petition for Expungement

       (1)  Except as provided in Rule 320, an individual who satisfies the requirements of 18 Pa.C.S. §  9122 for expungement of a summary case may request expungement by filing a petition with the clerk of the courts of the judicial district in which the charges were disposed.

       (2)  The petition shall set forth:

         (a)   the petitioner’s name and any aliases that the petitioner has used, address, date of birth, and social security number;

         (b)   the name and address of the issuing authority who accepted the guilty plea or heard the case;

         (c)   the name and mailing address of the affiant as shown on the complaint or citation, if available;

         (d)   the magisterial district court number;

         (e)   the docket number;

         (f)   the date on the citation or complaint, or the date of arrest, and, if available, the criminal justice agency that made the arrest;

         (g)   the specific charges, as they appear on the charging document, to be expunged;

         (h)   the disposition and, if the sentence includes a fine, costs, or restitution, whether the amount due has been paid;

         (i)   the reason(s) for expungement; and

         (j)   a verification by the petitioner that facts set forth in the petition are true and correct to the best of the petitioner’s personal knowledge or information and belief. The verification may be by a sworn affidavit or by an unsworn written statement that the facts are verified subject to the penalties for unsworn falsification to authorities under the Crimes Code §  4904, 18 Pa.C.S. §  4904.

    You must then wait 30 days after serving the petition to see if the Commonwealth (via the Bucks County DA's office) files a consent or objection to the petition.  The Commonwealth can also take no action.  

    If the Commonwealth objects, a hearing is set before a Bucks County Judge.  Your Bucks County criminal lawyer should argue in front of the judge for reasons why the expungement should be granted.  If the judge grants the expungement, an Order for Expungement is signed by the judge and the Clerk of Courts of Bucks County will serve a certified copy of the Order to the criminal justice agencies identified in the Order.  

    Summary Trials in Bucks County: Suppression Motions

    Summary Trial and Motions in Bucks County

    Suppression motions in criminal trials are very important.  In Bucks County, they can also be used and are appropriate in summary cases, as the case of Commonwealth v. Breslin cited.  

    So, if your lawyer believes there was an illegal stop or an illegal seizure in your case, he or she should present a suppression motion at your Summary Trial in Bucks County.